Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Alugoju, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Alugoju, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Public-good driven release of heterogeneous resources leads to genotypic diversification of an isogenic yeast population in melibiose.

Adaptive diversification of an isogenic population, and its molecular basis has been a subject of a number of studies in the last few years. Microbial populations offer a relatively convenient model system to study this question. In this context, an isogenic population of bacteria (E. coli, B. subtilis, and Pseudomonas) has been shown to lead to genetic diversification in the population, when propagated for a number of generations. This diversification is known to occur when the individuals in the population have access to two or more resources/environments, which are separated either temporally or spatially. Here, we report adaptive diversification in an isogenic population of yeast, S. cerevisiae, when propagated in an environment containing melibiose as the carbon source. The diversification is driven due to a public good, enzyme -galactosidase, leading to hydrolysis of melibiose into two distinct resources, glucose and galactose. The diversification is driven by a mutations at a single locus, in the GAL3 gene in the GAL/MEL regulon in the yeast.

microbiology↗

Using adaptive laboratory evolution of multicellular snowflake clusters in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to study reversibility of evolutionary processes.

Adaptive trajectories of populations have been focus of number of studies. However, adaptive trajectories have not been studied in the context of reverse evolution. By reverse evolution, we mean a scenario where selection is reversed. In this work, we use evolution (and reversal from) of multicellularity in S. cerevisiae as a model to answer this question. When selected for fast-settling variants, multicellularity evolves rapidly in the organism. On reversing selection, unicellularity evolves from the multicellular clusters. However, the dynamic trajectories of the two processes are different. In this context, evolution is not reversed dynamically at a phenotypic level. The phenotypic reversal is not driven by reversal of the original mutations during the forward evolution. Overall, our results show that the dynamics of molecular and phenotypic trajectories of evolution are distinct, and reversal of selection leads to unique trajectories of phenotypic reversal.

evolutionary biology↗