Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Altınısık, N. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Altınısık, N. E..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Population genomic history of the endangered Anatolian and Cyprian mouflons in relation to worldwide wild, feral and domestic sheep lineages

Once widespread in their homelands, Anatolian mouflon (Ovis gmelini anatolica) and Cyprian mouflon (Ovis gmelini ophion) were driven to near extinction during the 20th century and are currently listed as endangered populations by the IUCN. While the exact origins of these lineages remain unclear, they have been suggested to be close relatives of domestic sheep or remnants of proto-domestic sheep groups. Here, we study whole genome sequences of n=5 Anatolian mouflons and n=10 Cyprian mouflons in terms of population history and diversity, relative to eight other extant sheep lineages. We find reciprocal genetic affinity between Anatolian and Cyprian mouflons and domestic sheep, higher than all other studied wild sheep genomes, including the Iranian mouflon (Ovis gmelini). Despite similar recent population dynamics, Anatolian and Cyprian mouflons exhibit disparate diversity levels, which can potentially be attributed to founder effects, island isolation, introgression from domestic lineages, or different bottleneck dynamics. The lower relative mutation load found in Cyprian compared to Anatolian mouflons suggests the purging of recessive deleterious variants in the former. This agrees with estimates of a long-term small effective population size in the Cyprian mouflon. Both subspecies harbor considerable numbers of runs of homozygosity (ROH) blocks <2 Mb, which reflects the effect of small population size. Expanding our analyses to worldwide wild and feral Ovis genomes, we observe varying viability metrics among different lineages, and a limited consistency between viability metrics and conservation status. Factors such as recent inbreeding, introgression, and unique population dynamics may contribute to the observed disparities.

evolutionary biology↗

Pre-processing of paleogenomes: Mitigating reference bias and postmortem damage in ancient genome data

Ancient DNA analysis is subject to various technical challenges, including bias towards the reference allele ("reference bias"), postmortem damage (PMD) that confounds real variants, and limited coverage. Here, we conduct a systematic comparison of alternative approaches against reference bias and against PMD. To reduce reference bias, we either (a) mask variable sites before alignment or (b) align the data to a graph genome representing all variable sites. Compared to alignment to the linear reference genome, both masking and graph alignment effectively remove allelic bias when using simulated or real ancient human genome data, but only if sequencing data is available in FASTQ or unfiltered BAM format. Reference bias remains indelible in quality-filtered BAM files and in 1240K-capture data. We next study three approaches to overcome postmortem damage: (a) trimming, (b) rescaling base qualities, and (c) a new algorithm we present here, bamRefine, which masks only PMD-vulnerable polymorphic sites. We find that bamRefine is optimal in increasing the number of genotyped loci up to 20% compared to trimming and in improving accuracy compared to rescaling. We propose graph alignment coupled with bamRefine to minimise data loss and bias. We also urge the paleogenomics community to publish FASTQ files.

bioinformatics↗

Benchmarking kinship estimation tools for ancient genomes using pedigree simulations

There is growing interest in uncovering genetic kinship patterns in past societies using low-coverage paleogenomes. Here, we benchmark four tools for kinship estimation with such data: lcMLkin, NgsRelate, KIN, and READ, which differ in their input, IBD-estimation methods and statistical approaches. We used pedigree and ancient genome sequence simulations to evaluate these tools when only a limited number (1K to 50K) of shared SNPs (with minor allele frequency [&ge;]0.01) are available. The performance of all four tools was comparable using [&ge;]20K SNPs. We found that first-degree related pairs can be accurately classified even with 1K SNPs, with 85% F1 scores using READ and 96% using NgsRelate or lcMLkin. Distinguishing third-degree relatives from unrelated pairs or second-degree relatives was also possible with high accuracy (F1 >90%) with 5K SNPs using NgsRelate and lcMLkin, while READ and KIN showed lower success (69% and 79%, respectively). Meanwhile, noise in population allele frequencies and inbreeding (first cousin mating) led to deviations in kinship coefficients, with different sensitivities across tools. We conclude that using multiple tools in parallel might be an effective approach to achieve robust estimates on ultra-low coverage genomes.

genetics↗

The first complete genome of the extinct European wild ass (Equus hemionus hydruntinus)

We present paleogenomes of three morphologically-unidentified Anatolian equids dating to the 1st millennium BCE, sequenced to coverages of 0.6-6.4X. Mitochondrial DNA haplotypes of the Anatolian individuals clustered with those of Equus hydruntinus (or Equus hemionus hydruntinus), the extinct European wild ass. The Anatolian wild ass whole genome profiles fall outside the genomic diversity of other extant and past Asiatic wild ass (E.hemionus) lineages. These observations strongly suggest that the three Anatolian wild asses represent E.hydruntinus, making them the latest recorded survivors of this lineage, about a millennium later than the latest observations in the zooarchaeological record. Comparative genomic analyses suggest that E.hydruntinus was a sister clade to all ancient and present-day E.hemionus lineages, representing an early split. We also find indication of gene flow between hydruntines and Middle Eastern wild asses. Analyses of genome-wide heterozygosity and runs of homozygosity reveal that the Anatolian wild ass population had severely lost genetic diversity by the mid-1st millennium BCE, a likely omen of its eventual demise.

genomics↗

Circumpolar peoples and their languages: lexical and genomic data suggest ancient Chukotko-Kamchatkan-Nivkh and Yukaghir-Samoyedic connections

Relationships between universally recognized language families represent a hotly debated topic in historical linguistics, and the same is true for correlation between signals of genetic and linguistic relatedness. We developed a weighted permutation test and applied it on basic vocabularies for 31 pairs of languages and reconstructed proto-languages to show that three groups of circumpolar language families in the Northern Hemisphere show evidence of relationship though borrowing in the basic vocabulary or common descent: [Chukotko-Kamchatkan and Nivkh]; [Yukaghir and Samoyedic]; [Yeniseian, Na-Dene, and Burushaski]. The former two pairs showed the most significant signals of language relationship, and the same pairs demonstrated parallel signals of genetic relationship implying common descent or substantial gene flows. For finding the genetic signals we used genome-wide genetic data for present-day groups and a bootstrapping model comparison approach for admixture graphs or, alternatively, haplotype sharing statistics. Our findings further support some hypotheses on long-distance language relationship put forward based on the linguistic methods but lacking universal acceptance. Significance statementIndigenous people inhabiting polar and sub-polar regions in the Northern Hemisphere speak diverse languages belonging to at least seven language families which are traditionally thought of as unrelated entities. We developed a weighted permutation test and applied it to basic vocabularies of a number of languages and reconstructed proto-languages to show that at least three groups of circumpolar language families show evidence of relationship though either borrowing in the basic vocabulary or common descent: Chukotko-Kamchatkan and Nivkh; Yukaghir and Samoyedic; Yeniseian, Na-Dene, and Burushaski. The former two pairs showed the most significant signals of language relationship, and the same pairs demonstrated parallel signals of genetic relationship implying common descent or substantial gene flows.

genomics↗

Indian genetic heritage in Southeast Asian populations

The great ethnolinguistic diversity found today in mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) reflects multiple migration waves of people in the past. Deeply divergent East Eurasian hunter-gatherers were the first anatomically modern human population known to migrate to the region. Agriculturalists from South China migrated to the region and admixed with the local hunter-gatherers during the Neolithic period. During the Bronze and Iron Ages, the genetic makeup of people in MSEA changed again, indicating an additional influx of populations from South China. Maritime trading between MSEA and India was established at the latest 300 BCE, and the formation of early states in Southeast Asia during the first millennium CE was strongly influenced by Indian culture, and this cultural influence is still prominent today. Several ancient Indian-influenced states were located in present-day Thailand, and various populations in the country are likely to be descendants of people from those states. To systematically explore Indian genetic heritage in MSEA, we generated genome-wide SNP data (the HumanOrigins array) for 119 present-day individuals belonging to 10 ethnic groups from Thailand and co-analyzed them with published data from MSEA using the PCA, ADMIXTURE, f3-statistics, qpAdm, and qpGraph methods. We found South Asian low-level admixture in various MSEA populations which are probably descendants of people from the ancient Indian-influenced states, but failed to find a South Asian genetic component in present-day hunter-gatherer groups and relatively isolated groups from highlands in Northern Thailand. Our results also support close genetic affinity between Kra-Dai-speaking (also known as Tai-Kadai) and Austronesian-speaking populations, which fits a linguistic hypothesis suggesting cladality of the two language families. Author SummaryMainland Southeast Asia is a region with great ethnolinguistic diversity and complex population history. We studied genetic population history of present-day mainland Southeast Asian populations using genome-wide SNP data (the HumanOrigins array). We generated new data for 10 present-day ethnic groups from Thailand, which we further combined with published data from mainland and island Southeast Asians and worldwide populations. We revealed South Asian genetic admixture in various mainland Southeast Asian ethnic groups which are highly influenced by Indian culture, but failed to find it in groups who remained culturally isolated until recently. Our finding suggests that a massive migration of Indian people in the past was responsible for the spread of Indian culture in mainland Southeast Asia. We also found support for a close genetic affinity between Kra-Dai- and Austronesianspeaking populations, which fits a linguistic hypothesis suggesting cladality of the two language families.

genetics↗