Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Allhoff, K. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Allhoff, K. T..

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Eco-evolutionary dynamics create extinction avalanches in mutualistic-antagonistic networks

Evolution has given rise to the diversity of life on Earth, but it can also cause species extinctions. While major extinction events are usually associated with external drivers, in this study, we show mechanistically how evolution can trigger abrupt extinction avalanches in ecological networks without any environmental change. In particular, we investigate an eco-evolutionary simulation model of a tripartite mutualistic-antagonistic network, such as a plant-pollinator-herbivore network, with additional intraguild competition. The prevalence of self-organised extinction avalanches depends on a subtle balance of the different interaction types, where antagonism and similarity-based competition are needed for initial diversification while mutualism and trait-independent competition foster evolutionarily driven extinction events. Extinction avalanches are triggered by a mutualist evolving to interact with plants that are not subject to sufficient antagonistic control. Subsequently, the mutualist, its plant partners and their main antagonist potentially outcompete the rest of the community. Our findings point out that evolutionary murder may claim many victims simultaneously and highlight the need to take different interaction types into account to gain a comprehensive understanding of the links between evolution and biodiversity in ecological communities.

evolutionary biology↗

Stabilising effect of modularity in antagonistic networks depends on intraguild interactions

Existing literature on ecological networks provides valuable insights into the structure-stability relation of antagonistic, mutualistic or competitive systems, but it remains unclear whether these insights also apply to networks that contain a mix of different interaction types. Here, we study the effect of modularity on stability in systems that contain not only antagonistic interactions between two guilds, but also competition, facilitation or even antagonism within each guild, inspired by Ghanaian tree-liana interaction networks. We represent these systems as structured community matrices with random interaction strengths, in which we vary both the modularity within the antagonistic subnetwork and the type of intraguild interactions. Using the eigenvalues of the community matrix to assess stability, we find that modularity in antagonistic interactions generally has a stabilising effect, in line with results on single-interaction type networks. We furthermore find that the magnitude of this effect is modulated by the type of intra-guild interaction under consideration and is largest when these interactions describe facilitation. We explain these findings via a shift in the balance between self-reinforcing and self-damping feedback loops. Our results highlight the need to study how patterns in inter- and intraguild interactions jointly affect ecosystem stability.

ecology↗

Between Friends and Foes: Evolutionary Diversification in Mutualistic-Antagonistic Networks

Biotic interactions can drive evolutionary diversification, but the underlying mechanisms differ depending on the type of interaction. For instance, Ehrlich and Ravens escape-and-radiate coevolution provides a pathway of diversification in antagonistic interactions, whereas in mutualistic networks, coevolution is hypothesized to result in trait convergence rather than diversification. The combined effect of mutualism and antagonism on diversification remains unclear, even though organisms naturally engage in multiple types of interactions simultaneously. Using an eco-evolutionary simulation model, we investigate diversification in tripartite ecological networks such as plant-pollinator-herbivore networks. We find that diversification patterns vary according to the way mutualism and antagonism are connected on the trait level. If the two interactions are governed by uncorrelated plant traits, we observe little diversification in the mutualistic and substantial diversification in the antagonistic subnetwork. By contrast, if the same plant trait mediates both mutualism and antagonism (an example of ecological pleiotropy), diversification rates in all guilds become interdependent. In this case, even the mutualistic guild diversifies considerably when antagonism is strong, while strong mutualism restricts diversification also in the antagonistic guild. Our study underlines that the inclusion of multiple interaction types is necessary to advance our understanding of evolutionary dynamics in ecological networks.

evolutionary biology↗

Eco-evolutionary dynamics in competitive systems: Rescue or murder?

Rapid evolution in response to changing environments can have beneficial (e.g. evolutionary rescue) or detrimental (e.g. evolutionary suicide) outcomes for the survival of one species. Responses of multi-species systems are even harder to predict, but important to consider. We simulate eco-evolutionary dynamics in one- and two-species systems, with two traits per species: physiological performance (associated with abiotic pressure) and defense against interference competition (associated with biotic pressure). In the single-species system, evolution is consistently beneficial, enabling evolutionary rescue. In contrast, in the two-species system, evolution can be simultaneously beneficial and detrimental, because rescue of one species can lead to evolutionary murder of the other. Notably, the pattern of rescue and murder was largely independent of different ecological and evolutionary scenarios, indicating that evolutionary murder might be common in competitive systems. Our study enables exploration of eco-evolutionary dynamics in more complex biotic settings, extending understanding of species responses to abiotic and biotic changes.

ecology↗

Forecasting bryozoan assemblage dynamics under simulated climate change

The shallow Antarctic continental shelf experiences strong physical disturbances in the form of ice-scour which play a key role in maintaining biodiversity. Due to climate change, both the extent and duration of sea ice cover is expected to rapidly decline, leading to complex shifts in disturbance regimes with unknown impacts on successional dynamics and biodiversity in benthic communities. We introduce a simulation model to study the assemblage dynamics of Bryozoa, which are sessile, suspension feeding animals and key pioneers in the shallows. The model captures colonisation events, colony growth as well as intra- and interspecific overgrowth competition for space between colonies. Mortality due to predation is modelled as the removal of zooids within small areas of the model world. Using the model, we simulate various disturbance regimes, e.g. by varying the timing of ice-scour events, the length of the growing season and the spatial distribution of predation events. We find that the timing of ice-scour events throughout the growing season has only minor short-term effects on successional dynamics in bryozoan assemblages, while an extended growing season substantially accelerates succession in the long term. We furthermore find that relatively rare but large predation events lead to a slower recovery, whereas relatively frequent but small events result in a faster succession with higher overall abundances. These results highlight that in order to understand how benthic biodiversity will be impacted by climate change, it is necessary to consider the interplay between biotic interactions and complex changes in physical disturbance regimes. HighlightsO_LIWe use an individual-based model to simulate climate change impacts on bryozoan assemblages. C_LIO_LIWarming leads to complex shifts in timing and spatial distribution of disturbances. C_LIO_LISuccessional dynamics are affected by changes in growing season and predation events. C_LIO_LIInterplay of biotic interactions and physical disturbances drives benthic biodiversity. C_LI

ecology↗

From friend to foe and back - Coevolutionary transitions in the mutualism-antagonism continuum

Interspecific interactions evolve along a continuum ranging from mutualism to antagonism. Evolutionary theory so far focused mostly on parts of this continuum, notably on mechanisms that enable and stabilise mutualism. These mechanisms often involve partner discrimination ensuring that interaction intensity is higher with more cooperative partners. However, the gradual trajectory of coevolutionary transitions between mutualism and antagonism remains unclear. Here, we model how discrimination ability in one partner coevolves with mutualistic service provided by the other and analyse the resulting evolutionary trajectories in the mutualism-antagonism continuum. We show that strong ecological change, such as a radical host shift or colonisation of a new environment, can trigger transitions in both directions including back-and-forth transitions between antagonism and mutualism. Moreover, we find an evolutionary tipping point: a stable mutualism may break down to antagonism if the cost of either mutualistic service or discrimination ability gradually increases above a threshold beyond which this transition cannot be reversed by reducing costs again. Our study provides a new perspective on the evolution of biotic interactions and hence on the dynamic structure of ecological networks.

evolutionary biology↗

Skewness enables stabilising effect of hierarchy in complex competition networks

1Ecological networks tend to contain many weak and only few strong interactions. Furthermore, interaction strengths are often arranged or patterned in ways that enhance stability. However, little attention has been given to the relation between the "many weak and few strong links" distribution and the stabilising effect of patterning. Here, we focus on the stabilising effect of hierarchy in bryozoan competition networks, and demonstrate that it critically depends on a skewed distribution of interaction strengths. To this end, we first show that, in line with many other ecological networks, the empirically derived interaction strengths in competition networks were characterised by a high level of skewness, with many weak and few strong links. Then, we analysed the relationship between the interaction strength distributions, hierarchy and stability by comparing theoretical competition matrices with different distributions of interaction strengths. We found that the full stabilising effect of hierarchy only appeared when we used skewed interaction strengths produced by a gamma distribution, but not in matrices built with uniform or half-normal distributions. This has important methodological implications, since theoretical studies often assume normal or uniform distributions to study ecological stability, and therefore might overlook stabilising mechanisms. We conclude that since skewed interaction strengths are a common feature of ecological networks, they can be expected to play an important role in the relation between structure and stability in living systems.

ecology↗

Eco-evolutionary dynamics in two-species mutualistic systems: One-sided population decline triggers joint interaction disinvestment

The interplay between ecological and evolutionary dynamics can create feedback that reinforces external disturbances and potentially threatens species coexistence. For example, plants might invest less into attracting insect pollinators (decreased flower or nectar production) and more into independence (increased selfing or vegetative reproduction) when faced with pollinator decline. This adaptive response saves plant resources at the cost of further threatening the pollinator population. We ask under which conditions such self-reinforcing feedback occurs in two-species mutualistic systems when considering one-sided population decline and whether it can be counteracted by self-dampening feedback if co-evolution of both interaction partners is considered. Based on a mathematical model and in line with previous studies, we find that the described pattern of accelerated population decline occurs for a wide range of parameter values if a concave allocation trade-off between independent growth and interaction investment is assumed. The undisturbed population typically disinvests first, which then forces the declining population to also disinvest, in favour of other energy sources. However, a decelerated population decline can occur if the adaptation of the undisturbed partner is relatively slow compared to environmental decay, reducing the speed of its disinvestment, or if the initial investment into the interaction was very high. Our results suggest that if actions are taken to save endangered populations, not only the evolution of the target species but also of their interaction partner, as well as the interaction between them should be considered.

ecology↗

Collapse and rescue of evolutionary food webs under global warming

O_LIGlobal warming is severely impacting ecosystems and threatening ecosystem services as well as human well-being. While some species face extinction risk, several studies suggest the possibility that fast evolution may allow species to adapt and survive in spite of environmental changes. C_LIO_LIWe assess how such evolutionary rescue extends to multitrophic communities and whether evolution systematically preserves biodiversity under global warming. C_LIO_LIMore precisely, we expose simulated trophic networks of co-evolving consumers to warming under different evolutionary scenarios, which allows us to assess the effect of evolution on diversity maintenance. We also investigate how the evolution of body mass and feeding preference affects coexistence within a simplified consumer-resource module. C_LIO_LIOur simulations predict that the long-term diversity loss triggered by warming is considerably higher in scenarios where evolution is slowed down or switched off completely, indicating that eco-evolutionary feedback indeed helps to preserve biodiversity. However, even with fast evolution, food webs still experience vast disruptions in their structure and functioning. Reversing warming may thus not be sufficient to restore previous structures. C_LIO_LIOur findings highlight how the interaction between evolutionary rescue and changes in trophic structures constrains ecosystem responses to warming with important implications for conservation and management policies. C_LI

evolutionary biology↗