Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Aldrovandi, G. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Aldrovandi, G. M..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of oral and gut microbiome highlights role of oral bacteria in systemic inflammation in HIV

BackgroundChronic HIV-1 infection is associated with increased inflammation-related comorbidities, despite effective viral suppression with antiretroviral therapy. While the role of the gut microbiome in inflammation is well-studied, the contribution of the oral microbiome remains less clear. This study investigates the relationship between the oral and gut microbiomes in driving systemic inflammation in persons with HIV. MethodsThis cross-sectional study utilized archived samples from 198 participants (99 with HIV and 99 without HIV). Oral microbiome composition was analyzed via 16S rRNA sequencing and systemic inflammatory biomarkers were measured using multiplex assays. Gut microbiome data from previous studies were integrated for comparative analyses. Bacterial inflammatory potential was assessed through in vitro co-culture and epithelial barrier permeability assays. ResultsThe oral microbiome in HIV was characterized by increased Veillonella, Capnocytophaga, and Megasphaera, and several decreased genera including Fusobacterium. Using PERMANOVA, we found that the oral microbiome was a significant driver of cytokine variation in HIV compared to the gut microbiome, and identified specific associations with oral Veillonella and Megasphaera. We found no differences in anti-Veillonella parvula serum IgG by HIV status, but IgG titers did correlate with microbial translocation markers sCD14 and LBP in HIV. In vitro studies demonstrated that Veillonella parvula increased oral epithelial barrier permeability and induced monocyte activation. ConclusionsThe oral microbiome, particularly Veillonella parvula, may contributes to systemic inflammation in HIV through mechanisms involving epithelial barrier disruption, oral translocation, and monocyte activation.

microbiology↗

Gut barrier integrity biomarkers are associated with increased inflammation and predict disease status in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

The COVID-19 global pandemic persists as an endemic disease with frequent case spikes and a significant continued burden on public health. Although most COVID-19 cases are asymptomatic or mild, severe infections requiring hospitalization have resulted in likely more than 14 million cumulative deaths to date. One hallmark of severe COVID-19 is a dysregulated immune response that leads to systemic inflammation and contributes to disease severity and mortality but is not explained by viral replication alone. Severe COVID-19 has been shown to disrupt the gut microbiome and increase intestinal permeability which may contribute to immune dysregulation and systemic inflammation. In this study, we investigated the differences in plasma biomarkers for microbial translocation and gut barrier damage as well as circulating cytokines between healthy volunteers and patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We then performed a correlation analysis to understand how the relationships between these plasma biomarkers differed and used a random forest model to assess their accuracy in distinguishing between these two groups. Our results demonstrated that hospitalized COVID-19 patients have elevated concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines and markers of microbial translocation, and that the relationships between these biomarkers were significantly altered compared to healthy volunteers, especially those related to the mucosal associated homeostatic cytokines IL-17A and IL-23. Furthermore, IL-6 and LBP were the top biomarkers for prediction accuracy in our random forest model, highlighting the importance of managing microbial translocation in COVID-19 and its potential utility as a biomarker for disease severity. IMPORTANCECOVID-19 continues to be a burden on public health. Understanding how plasma biomarkers differ between healthy and acutely infected individuals can help in understanding pathogenesis and predict disease severity. It has been demonstrated that COVID-19 disrupts the gut microbiome and intestinal permeability, which contributes to systemic inflammation. Our study highlights the link between gut barrier integrity and inflammation in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 cases, demonstrating the usefulness of gut barrier integrity biomarkers in predicting disease severity, and offers insights for therapeutic interventions in acute COVID-19 infection.

immunology↗

NK cell-monocyte crosstalk underlies NK cell activation in severe COVID-19

NK cells in the peripheral blood of severe COVID-19 patients exhibit a unique profile characterized by activation and dysfunction. Previous studies have identified soluble factors, including type I interferon and TGF{beta}, that underlie this dysregulation. However, the role of cell-cell interactions in mediating changes in NK cell function during COVID-19 remains unclear. To address this question, we combined cell-cell communication analysis on existing single-cell RNA sequencing data with in vitro primary cell co-culture experiments to dissect the mechanisms underlying NK cell dysfunction in COVID-19. We found that NK cells are predicted to interact most strongly with monocytes and that this occurs via both soluble factors and direct interactions. To validate these findings, we performed in vitro co-cultures in which NK cells from healthy donors were incubated with monocytes from COVID-19+ or healthy donors. Co-culture of healthy NK cells with monocytes from COVID-19 patients recapitulated aspects of the NK cell phenotype observed in severe COVID-19, including decreased expression of NKG2D, increased expression of activation markers, and increased proliferation. When these experiments were performed in a transwell setting, we found that only CD56bright CD16- NK cells were activated in the presence of severe COVID-19 patient monocytes. O-link analysis of supernatants from transwell co-cultures revealed that cultures containing severe COVID-19 patient monocytes had significantly elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines as well as TGF{beta}. Collectively, these results demonstrate that interactions between NK cells and monocytes in the peripheral blood of COVID-19 patients contribute to NK cell activation and dysfunction in severe COVID-19. BACKGROUNDNatural killer (NK) cells are innate lymphocytes that are critical antiviral effectors. Because of their role in controlling acute viral infections, multiple studies have evaluated the role of NK cells in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Such studies revealed that NK cell phenotype and function are significantly altered by severe COVID-19; the peripheral NK cells of severe COVID-19 patients are highly activated and proliferative(1-5), with increased expression of cytotoxic molecules, Ki-67, and several surface markers of activation(3, 5-8). However, these NK cells also have dysfunctional cytotoxic responses to both tumor target cells(1, 2, 9, 10) and SARS-CoV-2-infected target cells(9, 10). Given that peripheral NK cells are thought to migrate to the lung during COVID-19(11-13), these results suggest that the NK cells of severe COVID-19 patients may be incapable of mounting a successful antiviral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although the unique phenotype and dysfunctionality of NK cells in severe COVID-19 has been well-characterized, the processes underlying these phenomena have not. Only one study has conducted in vitro mechanistic experiments to identify a possible cause of NK cell dysfunction: Witkowski et al. identified serum-derived TGF{beta} as a suppressor of NK cell functionality in severe COVID-19 patients(9). However, this study did not identify the source of serum TGF{beta}. Additionally, given the high degree of complexity within the immune system, there are likely other causes of NK cell dysfunction in COVID-19 that have thus far remain unexplored. One such mechanism may be the myriad of interactions between NK cells and other peripheral immune cells. NK cells are known to interact with CD4 and CD8 T cells, dendritic cells, neutrophils, and macrophages/monocytes(14), which can prime NK cell cytotoxicity or induce tolerance. Previous work by our lab suggested the potential for NK cell-monocyte crosstalk in severe COVID-19 through the expression of ligands for NK cell activating receptors on the monocytes of these patients(3). Crosstalk between NK cells and monocytes plays a role in regulating the NK cell response to other infections, including HIV-1(15, 16), mouse(17) and human cytomegalovirus(18), and malaria(19) through mechanisms including secretion of NK cell-regulating cytokines by monocytes. In this study, we used a combination of computational and in vitro methods to dissect the interactions between NK cells and monocytes in severe COVID-19. We utilized primary NK cells and monocytes from a large cohort of COVID-19 patients to demonstrate that co-culture of healthy NK cells with monocytes from severe COVID-19 donors can partially recapitulate the activated phenotype observed in the NK cells from COVID-19 patients. We then interrogated the mechanisms by which this activation occurs by performing NK cell-monocyte co-cultures in a transwell setting and using O-link to analyze the cytokines present in this system. Collectively, our work identifies monocytes as a driver of NK cell activation in severe COVID-19 and reveals interactions between NK cells and monocytes that may underlie this process.

immunology↗

Unique Genotypic Features of HIV-1 C Gp41 Membrane Proximal External Region Variants during Pregnancy Relate to Mother-to-child Transmission via Breastfeeding

Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) through breastfeeding remains a major source of pediatric HIV-1 infection worldwide. To characterize plasma HIV-1 subtype C populations from infected mothers during pregnancy that related to subsequent breast milk transmission, an exploratory study was designed to apply next generation sequencing and a custom bioinformatics pipeline for HIV-1 gp41 extending from heptad repeat region 2 (HR2) through the membrane proximal external region (MPER) and the membrane spanning domain (MSD). Viral populations during pregnancy from women who transmitted by breastfeeding, compared to those who did not, displayed greater biodiversity, more frequent amino acid polymorphisms, lower hydropathy index and greater positive charge. Viral characteristics were restricted to MPER, failed to extend into flanking HR2 or MSD regions, and were unrelated to predicted neutralization resistance. Findings provide novel parameters to evaluate an association between maternal MPER variants present during gestation and lactogenesis with subsequent transmission outcomes by breastfeeding. IMPORTANCEHIV-1 transmission through breastfeeding accounts for 39% of MTCT and continues as a major route of pediatric infection in developing countries where access to interventions for interrupting transmission is limited. Identifying women who are likely to transmit during breastfeeding would focus therapies during the breastfeeding period to reduce MTCT. Findings from our pilot study identify novel characteristics of gestational viral MPER quasispecies related to transmission outcomes and raise the possibility for predicting MTCT by breastfeeding based on identifying mothers with high-risk viral populations.

microbiology↗

Contributions to human breast milk microbiome and enteromammary transfer of Bifidobacterium breve

Increasing evidence supports the importance of the breast milk microbiome in seeding the infant gut. However, the origin of bacteria in milk and the process of milk microbe-mediated seeding of infant intestine need further elucidation. Presumed sources of bacteria in milk include locations of mother-infant and mother-environment interactions. We investigate the role of mother-infant interaction on breast milk microbes. Shotgun metagenomics and 16S rRNA gene sequencing identified milk microbes of mother-infant pairs in breastfed infants and in infants that have never latched. Although breast milk has low overall biomass, milk microbes play an important role in seeding the infant gut. Breast milk bacteria were largely comprised of Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Acinetobacter, and Enterobacter primarily derived from maternal areolar skin and infant oral sites in breastfeeding pairs. This suggests that the process of breastfeeding is a potentially important mechanism for propagation of breast milk microbes through retrograde flux via infant oral and areolar skin contact. In one infant delivered via Caesarian section, a distinct strain of Bifidobacteria breve was identified in maternal rectum, breast milk and the infants stool potentially suggesting direct transmission. This may support the existence of microbial translocation of this anaerobic bacteria via the enteromammary pathway in humans, where maternal bacteria translocate across the maternal gut and are transferred to the mammary glands. Modulating sources of human milk microbiome seeding potentially imply opportunities to ultimately influence the development of the infant microbiome and health.

microbiology↗

Effects of exclusive breastfeeding on infant gut microbiota: a meta-analysis across studies and populations

Literature regarding the differences in gut microbiota between exclusively breastfed (EBF) and non-EBF infants is meager with large variation in methods and results. We performed a meta-analysis of seven studies (a total of 1825 stool samples from 684 infants) to investigate effects of EBF compared to non-EBF on infant gut microbiota across different populations. In the first 6 months of life, overall bacterial diversity, gut microbiota age, relative abundances of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes and microbial-predicted pathways related to carbohydrate metabolism were consistently increased; while relative abundances of pathways related to lipid, vitamin metabolism and detoxification were decreased in non-EBF vs. EBF infants. The perturbation in microbial-predicted pathways associated with non-EBF was larger in infants delivered by C-section than delivered vaginally. Longer duration of EBF mitigated diarrhea-associated gut microbiota dysbiosis and the effects of EBF persisted after 6 months of age. These consistent findings across vastly different populations suggest that one of the mechanisms of short and long-term benefits of EBF may be alteration in gut microbes.

microbiology↗