Albertos Torres, D. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2025

Evaluating long-term stool preservation methods for maximizing the recovery of viable human fecal microbiota

The gut microbiome plays a fundamental role in human health, prompting efforts to catalogue and preserve its diversity across human populations. While DNA sequencing dominates microbiome research, cultivation remains essential for mechanistic studies and therapeutic development. Yet, best practices for long-term stool preservation remain limited. Here, we compared the stability of eight cryopreservation treatments for maintaining viable stool microbiota over a 1-year storage period at -80{degrees}C (freezer) or at -196{degrees}C (liquid nitrogen), using samples from infants, children, and adults. Combining cultivation on six media with 16S rRNA sequencing, we show that ultralow temperature cryopreservation has minimal impact on microbiota diversity compared to fresh cultures. Standard glycerol preservation and simple snap-freezing performed comparably to more complex and costly protocols, with all cultured samples retaining donor-specific microbiota profiles also after long-term cryopreservation. The lack of strong treatment-specific effects on microbiota composition suggest a shared microbial response to freeze-thaw stress favoring fast-growing taxa. Our findings offer practical, low-cost strategies for stool biobanking. ImportanceThe cultivation of bacterial taxa from complex communities, such as those in fecal samples, is essential for mechanistic studies and the development of microbiota-based therapeutics, including defined consortia and individual probiotic strains. Such cultivation efforts typically rely on previously stored samples; however, systematic knowledge regarding long-term preservation strategies that ensure viability and regrowth of constituent bacterial taxa remains limited. In this study, we systematically evaluated 16 distinct cryopreservation conditions to assess their efficacy in maintaining bacterial viability. Our results show that conventional glycerol-based preservation and simple snap-freezing are comparable in performance to more elaborate and cost-intensive protocols. Moreover, we identified the duration of sample transport prior to freezing as a critical determinant of post-thaw bacterial recovery. These findings provide valuable data on the relative effectiveness of various preservation methods and support the use of low-cost, easily implementable strategies that are particularly suitable for application in resource-limited settings.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2024

A novel barcoded nanopore sequencing workflow of high-quality, full-length bacterial 16S amplicons for taxonomic annotation of bacterial isolates and complex microbial communities

IntroductionDue to recent improvements, Nanopore sequencing has become a promising method for experiments relying on amplicon sequencing. We describe a flexible workflow to generate and annotate high-quality, full-length 16S rDNA amplicons. We evaluated it for two applications, namely, i) identification of bacterial isolates and ii) species-level profiling of microbial communities. MethodsBacterial isolate identification by sequencing was tested on 47 isolates and compared to MALDI-TOF MS. 97 isolates were additionally sequenced to assess the resolution of phylogenetic classification. Species-level community profiling was tested with two full-length 16S primer pairs (A and B) with custom barcodes and compared to results obtained with Illumina sequencing using 27 stool samples. Finally, a Nextflow pipeline was developed to produce high-quality reads and taxonomically annotate them. ResultsWe found high agreement between our workflow and MALDI-TOF data for isolate identification (PPV = 0.90, Cramers V = 0.857 and, Theils U = 0.316). For species-level community profiling, we found strong correlations (rs > 0.6) of alpha diversity indices between the two primer sets and Illumina sequencing. At the community level, we found significant but small differences when comparing sequencing techniques. Finally, we found moderate to strong correlation when comparing relative abundances of individual species (average rs = 0.6 and 0.533, for primers A and B). DiscussionThe proposed workflow enabled accurate identification of single bacterial isolates, making it a worthwhile alternative to MALDI-TOF. While shortcomings have been identified, it enabled reliable identification of prominent features in microbial communities at a fraction of the cost of Illumina sequencing. ImportanceA quick, robust, simple, and cost-effective method to identify bacterial isolates and communities in each sample is indispensable in the fields of microbiology and infection biology. Recent technological advances in Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing make this technique an attractive option considering the adaptability, portability, and cost-effectiveness of the platform. Here, we validated a flexible workflow to identify bacterial isolates and characterize bacterial communities using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing platform combined with the most recent v14 chemistry kits. For bacterial isolates, we compared our nanopore-based approach to MALDI-TOF MS-based identification. For species-level profiling of complex bacterial communities we compared our nanopore-based approach to Illumina shotgun sequencing. For reproducibility purposes, we wrapped the code used to process the sequencing data into a ready-to-use and self-contained Nextflow pipeline.

microbiology↗