Biology subjects

Albert, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Albert, R..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Target Control in Logical Models Using the Domain of Influence of Nodes

Dynamical models of biomolecular networks are successfully used to understand the mechanisms underlying complex diseases and to design therapeutic strategies. Network control, and its special case of target control, is a promising avenue toward developing disease therapies. In target control it is assumed that a small subset of nodes is most relevant to the systems state and the goal is to drive the target nodes into their desired states. An example of target control would be driving a cell to commit to apoptosis (programmed cell death). From the experimental perspective, gene knockout, pharmacological inhibition of proteins and providing sustained external signals are among practical intervention techniques. We identify methodologies to use the stabilizing effect of sustained interventions for target control in logical models of biomolecular networks. Specifically, we define the domain of influence of a node (in a certain state) to be the nodes (and their corresponding states) that will be ultimately stabilized by the sustained state of this node regardless of the initial state of the system. We also define the related concept of the logical domain of influence of a node, and develop an algorithm for its identification using an auxiliary network that incorporates the regulatory logic. This way a solution to the target control problem is a set of nodes whose domain of influence can cover the desired target node states. We perform greedy randomized adaptive search in state space to find such solutions. We apply our strategy to several biological networks to demonstrate its effectiveness.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Identifying (un)controllable dynamical behavior with applications to biomolecular networks

We present a technique applicable in any dynamical framework to identify control-robust subsets of an interacting system. These robust subsystems, which we call stable modules, are characterized by constraints on the variables that make up the subsystem. They are robust in the sense that if the defining constraints are satisfied at a given time, they remain satisfied for all later times, regardless of what happens in the rest of the system, and can only be broken if the constrained variables are externally manipulated. We identify stable modules as graph structures in an expanded network, which represents causal links between variable constraints. A stable module represents a system \"decision point\", or trap subspace. Using the expanded network, small stable modules can be composed sequentially to form larger stable modules that describe dynamics on the system level. Collections of large, mutually exclusive stable modules describe the systems repertoire of long-term behaviors. We implement this technique in a broad class of dynamical systems and illustrate its practical utility via examples and algorithmic analysis of two published biological network models. In the segment polarity gene network of Drosophila melanogaster, we obtain a state-space visualization that reproduces by novel means the four possible cell fates and predicts the outcome of cell transplant experiments. In the T-cell signaling network, we identify six signaling elements that determine the high-signal response and show that control of an element connected to them cannot disrupt this response.\n\nAuthor summaryWe show how to uncover the causal relationships between qualitative statements about the values of variables in ODE systems. We then show how these relationships can be used to identify subsystem behaviors that are robust to outside interventions. This informs potential system control strategies (e.g., in identifying drug targets). Typical analytical properties of biomolecular systems render them particularly amenable to our techniques. Furthermore, due to their often high dimension and large uncertainties, our results are particularly useful in biomolecular systems. We apply our methods to two quantitative biological models: the segment polarity gene network of Drosophila melanogaster and the T-cell signal transduction network.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2017

A network modeling approach to elucidate drug resistance mechanisms and predict combinatorial drug treatments in breast cancer

BackgroundMechanistic models of within-cell signal transduction networks can explain how these networks integrate internal and external inputs to give rise to the appropriate cellular response. These models can be fruitfully used in cancer cells, whose aberrant decision-making regarding their survival or death, proliferation or quiescence can be connected to errors in the state of nodes or edges of the signal transduction network.\n\nResultsHere we present a comprehensive network, and discrete dynamic model, of signal transduction in breast cancer based on the literature of ER+, HER2+, and PIK3CA-mutant breast cancers. The network model recapitulates known resistance mechanisms to PI3K inhibitors and suggests other possibilities for resistance. The model also reveals known and novel combinatorial interventions that are more effective than PI3K inhibition alone.\n\nConclusionsThe use of a logic-based, discrete dynamic model enables the identification of results that are mainly due to the organization of the signaling network, and those that also depend on the kinetics of individual events. Network-based models such as this will play an increasing role in the rational design of high-order therapeutic combinations.

cancer biology↗