Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Alagesan, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Alagesan, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Glycan size and attachment site location affect electron transfer dissociation (ETD) fragmentation and automated glycopeptide identification

We used a small synthetic glycopeptide library to systematically evaluate the effect of glycosylation site location and glycan size on the efficiency of ETD MS/MS fragmentation and subsequent automated identification. Understanding how the physico-chemical properties of glycopeptides influence glycopeptide fragmentation allows for optimizing fragmentation conditions and software assisted data analyses, which rely on informative fragmentation spectra for subsequent data processing to identify glycopeptides. Often, mis-assignment of glycopeptides occurs due to uncertainties such as failure to produce sufficient peptide backbone fragment ions. Our synthetic glycopeptide library contained glycopeptides differing in glycosylation site position within the peptide as well as glycan size (from the pentasaccharide N-glycan core to fully sialylated, biantennary N-glycans). Different software solutions such as SEQUEST and Amanda were compared for ETD glycopeptide identification. We found that all, glycan size, glycosylation site position within a glycopeptide and individual precursor m/z significantly impacted the number and quality of assignable glycopeptide backbone fragments, and thus the likelihood to be correctly identified in software assisted data analyses.

biochemistry

To enrich or not to enrich: Enhancing (glyco)peptide ionization using the CaptiveSpray nanoBooster ™

The CaptiveSpray source ensures a stable spray and excellent nano ESI performance facilitated by a vortex gas that sweeps around the emitter spray tip to support liquid desolvation and focus the Taylor cone. Enriching the vortex gas with dopant solvents provides tremendous opportunities to increase ionization efficiency, in particular for hydrophilic compounds such as glycopeptides. How this CaptiveSpray nanobooster benefits their analysis, however, has to date not been systematically studied.\n\nWe evaluated various dopant solvents such as (i) acetone (ii) acetonitrile (iii) methanol (iv) ethanol and (v) isopropanol for their ability to enhance glycopeptide ionization. Using a synthetic IgG2 glycopeptide as a standard, acetonitrile provided a five-fold increase in signal intensities and resulted in an overall charge state increase compared to conventional CaptiveSpray ionization. This trend remained the same when tryptic IgG (glyco)peptides were analyzed and allowed highly sensitive detection of glycopeptides even without any enrichment. While acetone dopant gas enhanced glycopeptide ionization by doubling glycopeptide signal intensities, all other tested solvents resulted either in ion suppression or adduct formation. This is in agreement with and can be explained by their individual physio-chemical properties of the solvents. Finally, by omitting glycopeptide enrichment steps, we established a bias-free human Immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass specific glycosylation profile applying the optimized CaptiveSpray nanoBooster nano-LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis conditions.

biochemistry