Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Akhter, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Akhter, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

In vitro study of BromAc on SARS-CoV-2 spike and envelope proteins shows synergy and disintegration at modest concentrations

Background and objectivesSARS-CoV-2 infection is the cause of a worldwide pandemic, currently with limited therapeutic options. Whilst vaccines are at the forefront of the therapeutic initiative, drug repurposing remains a promising approach for SARS-CoV-2 treatment. BromAc (Bromelain & Acetylcysteine) has synergistic action against glycoproteins by the synchronous breakage of glycosidic linkages and disulfide bonds. The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, formed of glycoprotein and disulfide bridges for stabilization, represents an attractive target as it is essential for binding to the ACE2 receptor in host cells present in nasal mucosa. We sought to determine the effect of BromAc on the Spike and Envelope proteins and its potential to reduce infectivity in host cells. DesignRecombinant Spike and Envelope proteins were treated by single agent and combination BromAc at 50 and 100 {micro}g/20mg/mL and analyzed by electrophoresis. Ultraviolet analysis of disulfide bond reduction was performed for both Spike and Envelope proteins after treatment with Acetylcysteine. In vitro whole virus culture inactivation of pre-treated wild type and an S1/S2 Spike mutant SARS-CoV-2 with BromAc from 25 to 250 {micro}g/20mg/mL was measured by cytopathic effect, cell lysis assay, and replication capacity by RT-PCR. ResultsRecombinant Spike and Envelope SARS-CoV-2 proteins were fragmented by BromAc at both 50 and 100 {micro}g/20mg/mL whilst single agents had minimal effect. Spike and Envelope protein disulfide bonds were reduced by Acetylcysteine. In vitro whole virus culture of both wild type and Spike mutant SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated a concentration-dependent inactivation from BromAc treatment but not from single agents. ConclusionBromAc disintegrates SARS-CoV-2 Spike and Envelope proteins. In vitro tests on whole virus support this finding with inactivation of its replication capacity most strongly at 100 and 250 {micro}g/20mg/mL BromAc, even in Spike mutant virus. Clinical testing through nasal administration in patients with early SARS-CoV-2 infection is imminent. Author SummaryThere is currently no suitable therapeutic treatment for early SARS-CoV-2 aimed to prevent disease progression. BromAc is under clinical development by the authors for mucinous cancers due to its ability to alter complex glycoproteins structure. The potential of BromAc on SARS-CoV-2 Spike and Envelope glycoproteins stabilized by disulfide bonds was examined and found to disintegrate recombinant Spike and Envelope proteins whilst reducing disulfide stabilizer bridges. BromAc also showed an inhibitory effect on wild-type and Spike mutant SARS-CoV-2 by inactivation of its replication capacity in vitro. Hence, BromAc may be an effective therapeutic agent for early SARS-CoV-2 infection, despite mutations, and even have potential as a prophylactic in people at high risk of infection.

microbiology

Dynamics of the COVID -19 Related Publications

BackgroundThis study aims to analyze the dynamics of the published articles and preprints of Covid-19 related literature from different scientific databases and sharing platforms. MethodsThe PubMed, Elsevier, and Research Gate (RG) databases were under consideration in this study over a specific time. Analyses were carried out on the number of publications as (a) function of time (day), (b) journals and (c) authors. Doubling time of the number of publications was analyzed for PubMed "all articles" and Elsevier published articles. Analyzed databases were (1A) PubMed "all articles" (01/12/2019-12/06/2020) (1B) PubMed Review articles (01/12/2019-2/5/2020) and (1C) PubMed Clinical Trials (01/01/2020-30/06/2020) (2) Elsevier all publications (01/12/2019-25/05/2020) (3) RG (Article, Pre Print, Technical Report) (15/04/2020-30/4/2020). FindingsTotal publications in the observation period for PubMed, Elsevier, and RG were 23000, 5898 and 5393 respectively. The average number of publications/day for PubMed, Elsevier and RG were 70.0 {+/-}128.6, 77.6{+/-}125.3 and 255.6{+/-}205.8 respectively. PubMed shows an avalanche in the number of publication around May 10, number of publications jumped from 6.0{+/-}8.4/day to 282.5{+/-}110.3/day. The average doubling time for PubMed, Elsevier, and RG was 10.3{+/-}4 days, 20.6 days, and 2.3{+/-}2.0 days respectively. In PubMed average articles/journal was 5.2{+/-}10.3 and top 20 authors representing 935 articles are of Chinese descent. The average number of publications per author for PubMed, Elsevier, and RG was 1.2{+/-}1.4, 1.3{+/-}0.9, and 1.1{+/-}0.4 respectively. Subgroup analysis, PubMed review articles mean and median review time for each article were <0|17{+/-}17|77> and 13.9 days respectively; and reducing at a rate of-0.21 days (count)/day. InterpretationAlthough the disease has been known for around 6 months, the number of publications related to the Covid-19 until now is huge and growing very fast with time. It is essential to rationalize the publications scientifically by the researchers, authors, reviewers, and publishing houses. FundingNone

scientific communication and education