Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ahangari, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Ahangari, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Improving the discovery of rare variants associated with alcohol problems by leveraging machine learning phenotype prediction and functional information.

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is moderately heritable with significant social and economic impact. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified common variants associated with AUD, however, rare variant investigations have yet to achieve well-powered sample sizes. In this study, we conducted an interval-based exome-wide analysis of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test Problems subscale (AUDIT-P) using both machine learning (ML) predicted risk and empirical functional weights. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource (application number 30782.) Filtering the 200k exome release to unrelated individuals of European ancestry resulted in a sample of 147,386 individuals with 51,357 observed and 96,029 unmeasured but predicted AUDIT-P for exome analysis. Sequence Kernel Association Test (SKAT/SKAT-O) was used for rare variant (Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) < 0.01) interval analyses using default and empirical weights. Empirical weights were constructed using annotations found significant by stratified LD Score Regression analysis of predicted AUDIT-P GWAS, providing prior functional weights specific to AUDIT-P. Using only samples with observed AUDIT-P yielded no significantly associated intervals. In contrast, ADH1C and THRA gene intervals were significant (False discovery rate (FDR) <0.05) using default and empirical weights in the predicted AUDIT-P sample, with the most significant association found using predicted AUDIT-P and empirical weights in the ADH1C gene (SKAT-O P Default= 1.06 x 10-9 and P Empirical weight = 6.25 x 10-11). These findings provide evidence for rare variant association of the ADH1C gene with the AUDIT-P and highlight the successful leveraging of ML to increase effective sample size and prior empirical functional weights based on common variant GWAS data to refine and increase the statistical significance in underpowered phenotypes.

genetics↗

The effects of reference panel perturbations on the accuracy of genotype imputation

Reference-based genotype imputation is a standard technique that has become increasingly popular in large-scale studies involving genomic data. The two key elements involved in the process of genotype imputation are (1) the haplotype reference panel to which a target individual is being imputed, and (2) the imputation algorithm used to infer missing genotypes in the target individual. The imputation literature has historically focused mainly on (2), with a typical comparative study investigating the relative performance of various imputation algorithms while holding the reference panel constant. However, the role of the reference panel itself (1) on overall imputation performance is equally, if not more, important than the choice among many high-performing algorithms. Even though it is intuitive that the quality of a reference panel should play a role in the accuracy of imputation, it is nonetheless unclear to what extent common errors during panel creation (e.g., genotyping and phase error) lead to suboptimal imputation performance. In this study, we investigate the effects of applying three distinct modes of perturbations to a widely used haplotype reference panel in human genetics on the resulting imputation accuracy. Specifically, we perturb the reference panel by (1) randomly introducing phase errors, (2) randomly introducing genotype errors, and (3) randomly pruning variants from the panel (all at varying magnitudes). We then impute a set of diverse individuals at various sequencing coverages (0.5x, 1.0x, and 2.0x) to these various perturbed panels and evaluate imputation accuracy using the r2 metric for the entire cohort as well as ancestry-stratified subsets. We observe that both phase- and genotype-perturbations can dramatically affect imputation accuracy, particularly at very low allele frequencies, while pruning variants has a far smaller effect. We then empirically verified that our simulations reliably predict the impact of potential filtering techniques in a real-world dataset. In the context of haplotype reference panels, these results suggest that phasing and genotyping accuracy are far more important than the density of a reference panel used for imputation.

genomics↗