Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Adegbenro, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Adegbenro, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Hyperreflexia after corticospinal tract lesion reflects 1A afferent circuit changes not increased KCC2 hyperexcitability

Hyperreflexia is a consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI) and motor system lesions in the brain Two major mechanisms underpinning hyperreflexia have been reported: proprioceptive afferent (PA) circuit changes produced by 1A fiber sprouting, which could enhance reflex signaling, together with reduced GABAergic inhibitory presynaptic regulation (GABApre); and increased intrinsic motor neuron excitability, for example, produced by reduced motor neuron membrane-bound potassium-chloride co-transporter2 (KCC2). Here we examine how selective unilateral CST injury in the medullary pyramid (PTX), which eliminates the CST from one hemisphere, allows for specific investigation of the different mechanisms to determine their contributions to hyperreflexia. We used rate-dependent depression (RDD) of the Hoffmann (H)-reflex for the forelimb and hindlimb 5th-digit abductor muscles to assess hyperreflexia on both the contra-and ipsilesional sides. We compared RDD in naive and unilateral-PTX rats at 7-dpi and 42-dpi, supplemented with additional timepoints to examine hyperreflexia development. Immunohistochemistry was used to identify PA synapses (VGlut1), GABA presynaptic boutons (GABApre), motor neurons (ChAT), and to measure KCC2. Following unilateral PTX, we observed significant hyperreflexia in the contralesional forelimb only. Membrane-bound KCC2 was unchanged in contralesional cervical motor neurons. Whereas both cervical and lumbar motor neurons showed increased PA sprouting contralesionally, there was a concomitant increase in GABApre terminals for the lumbar not cervical cord, which associated with a normal hindlimb H-reflex. Our findings show that KCC2 is disassociated from hyperreflexia in the uniPTX model. Instead, forelimb hyperreflexia can be explained by cervical motor neuron PA sprouting and an uncompensated GABApre regulation.

neuroscience↗

DNA polymerase η is regulated by mutually exclusive mono-ubiquitination and mono-NEDDylation

DNA polymerase eta (Pol {eta}) is a Y-family translesion polymerase responsible for synthesizing new DNA across UV-damaged templates. It is recruited to replication forks following mono-ubiquitination of the PCNA DNA clamp. This interaction is mediated by PCNA-interacting protein (PIP) motifs within Pol {eta}, as well as by its C-terminal ubiquitin-binding zinc finger (UBZ) domain. Previous work has suggested that Pol {eta} itself is mono-ubiquitinated at four C-terminal lysine residues, which is dependent on prior ubiquitin-binding by its UBZ domain. Here, we show that Pol {eta} can be modified at the same lysine residues by the ubiquitin-like protein, NEDD8. Like ubiquitination, this modification is driven by non-covalent interactions between NEDD8 and the UBZ domain. While only a small proportion of Pol {eta} is mono-NEDDylated under normal conditions, these levels rapidly increase by inhibiting the COP9 signalosome, suggesting that mono-NEDDylation is maintained under strong negative regulation. Finally, we provide data to support that mono-ubiquitination is important for Pol {eta} foci formation and suggest that NEDDylation disrupts this process. These results reveal a new mechanism of Pol {eta} regulation by ubiquitin-like proteins.

biochemistry↗