Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Abramyan, T. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Abramyan, T. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Overcoming the accuracy-generalization tradeoff in docking and scoring for prospective virtual screening

Virtual screening promises access to tens of billions of synthetically accessible, diverse compounds, yet it is rarely used as a primary hit-discovery strategy in contemporary drug-discovery campaigns. We argue that this gap reflects the real-world underperformance of the underlying docking and scoring methods: classical docking is generalizable but limited in accuracy by simple functional forms and parsimonious parameterization, whereas recent machine-learning approaches are highly expressive but do not generalize well to novel molecules and pockets, their reported accuracy often inflated by train-test leakage. To address these challenges, we introduce DODock and DOScore, docking and scoring ML/physics hybrid frameworks that are also highly expressive, yet generalize much better out of distribution compared with the prior ML approaches. This generalization has been prospectively tested in several ways. First, DODocks blind prediction of a drug candidate binding to PCSK9 was compared to the crystal structure that was subsequently solved, recovering the binding pose to 1.2 [A] RMSD. We also used DODock and DOScore in prospective virtual screening campaigns against four therapeutic targets, spanning an ectoenzyme (CD73), a kinase (IRAK4), an extended-substrate protease (FXI), and an allosteric inhibition of protein-protein interface (IL17). These screens yielded many chemically novel, biochemically and cellularly active inhibitors. In the case of CD73, which is a historically challenging target for virtual screening, our screen resulted in a roughly hundredfold improvement in hit rate over a recent machine-learning screen. Our results indicate that the apparent ceiling in the accuracy of virtual screening that seemed to have somewhat plateaued in the last two decades is not fundamental, and that structure-based interrogation of ultralarge chemical space may eventually become a credible primary route to novel chemical matter.

biophysics↗

A decoy heterotrimeric Gα protein has substantially reduced nucleotide binding but retains nucleotide-independent interactions with its cognate RGS protein and Gβγ dimer

Plants uniquely have a family of proteins called extra-large G proteins (XLG) that share homology in their C-terminal half with the canonical G subunits; we carefully detail here that Arabidopsis XLG2 lacks critical residues requisite for nucleotide binding and hydrolysis which is consistent with our quantitative analyses. Based on microscale thermophoresis, Arabidopsis XLG2 binds GTP{gamma}S with an affinity 100-1000 times lower than that to canonical G subunits. This means that given the concentration range of guanine nucleotide in plant cells, XLG2 is not likely bound by GTP in vivo. Homology modeling and molecular dynamics simulations provide a plausible mechanism for the poor nucleotide binding affinity of XLG2. Simulations indicate substantially stronger salt bridge networks formed by several key amino-acid residues of AtGPA1 which are either misplaced or missing in XLG2. These residues in AtGPA1 not only maintain the overall shape and integrity of the apoprotein cavity but also increase the frequency of favorable nucleotide-protein interactions in the nucleotide-bound state. Despite this loss of nucleotide dependency, XLG2 binds the RGS domain of AtRGS1 with an affinity similar to the Arabidopsis AtGPA1 in its apo-state and about 2 times lower than AtGPA1 in its transition state. In addition, XLG2 binds the G{beta}{gamma} dimer with an affinity similar to that of AtGPA1. XLG2 likely acts as a dominant negative G protein to block G protein signaling. We propose that XLG2, independent of guanine nucleotide binding, regulates the active state of the canonical G protein pathway directly by sequestering G{beta}{gamma} and indirectly by promoting heterodimer formation.

biochemistry↗