Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Abdel Kafi, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Abdel Kafi, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Blindness reshapes mental time travel: From perceptual scenes to conceptual scaffolds

How can humans remember and imagine without vision? Mental time travel, the ability to re-experience past events and envision future ones, is widely assumed to rely on visual imagery and the construction of mental scenes. Blindness provides a critical test of this assumption. Across behavioral interviews, language analyses, and multimodal neuroimaging in congenitally blind, late-blind, and sighted individuals, we show that blind individuals, even those blind from birth, mentally time travel as vividly as sighted people, but construct their inner worlds differently. Sighted participants relied on perceptual detail and activated classic scene-processing regions, whereas blind participants emphasized thoughts and emotions and recruited reorganized occipital cortex. Connectivity analyses revealed strengthened coupling between occipital and medial temporal regions, indicating adaptive reconfiguration of the episodic system. The brain does not require images to imagine: it flexibly builds internal experiences using the representational resources available. Summary ParagraphHow humans reconstruct events that are no longer available to the senses is a fundamental but unresolved question. Remembering the past and imagining the future, known as mental time travel, is a defining feature of human cognition, shaping identity and guiding decisions{superscript 1},{superscript 2}. Prevailing theories assume that such constructions depend on visual imagery, with the minds eye reconstructing events on a visuospatial stage3,. Blindness provides a critical test of this assumption. Across extensive behavioral interviews and multimodal neuroimaging, we find that mental time travel remains phenomenologically intact in blindness, but its scaffolding changes fundamentally. Sighted individuals rely on perceptual detail and activate regions specialized for visual scenes, whereas blind individuals, whether blind from birth or later in life, emphasize thoughts and emotions and reorganize occipital cortex for conceptual strategies,. These contrasting strategies map onto distinct neural signatures, revealing a dissociation between perceptual and conceptual routes to episodic simulation. Together, these findings reveal that the brains capacity to construct internal experience rests on conceptual scaffolding, not perceptual re-creation.

neuroscience↗

Seeing more than schemas: the vmPFC represents imagery- rich mental scenarios

Mental imagery varies dramatically across individuals, from vivid scene construction to the complete absence of visual experience, as seen in aphantasia. While the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is traditionally associated with abstract, schematic representations, emerging theories suggest it may also contribute to constructing vivid, visual mental content. To test this, we developed a novel 7T fMRI experiment varying imagery demands across conditions: Prior to scanning, participants memorized richly detailed scenarios, more constrained, stationary objects, and finally semantic definitions for each of three abstract German words (e.g., hope). During fMRI and eye-tracking, the same word was presented across trials, but participants vividly re-engaged with one of three distinct representations (i.e., scenarios, objects, and definitions), allowing for comparison across richly different cognitive modes triggered by identical visual input. Univariate analyses confirmed previous findings; highlighting the roles of the vmPFC, hippocampus, parahippocampal cortex, and visual-perceptual cortex in imagery-rich scenario construction. We further performed multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA) to examine distributed neural representations, which can reveal the informational content of mental imagery beyond activation magnitude. Critically, the vmPFC was the only brain region where MVPA classifier accuracy was higher for scenario construction than for object and abstract conditions, directly supporting our hypothesis that the vmPFC encodes imagery-rich details rather than solely abstract, schematic information. Eye movement variability also distinguished between conditions. These findings advance our understanding of vmPFC function, emphasising its role in representing vivid mental content. HighlightsO_LI{middle dot} vmPFC distinctly represents imagery-rich scenarios in MVPA analysis C_LIO_LIUnivariate fMRI reveals increased HC and PHC activity during scenario construction C_LIO_LIEye movements vary by imagery type, distinguishing scenarios from objects and definitions C_LI

neuroscience↗